No one said NATO style. You said no one in the West pledged protection, the US did. The only thing arguable about it is how much protection was stated. The US backtracked and now say it simply means they will recognize Ukrainian borders and border incursions into Ukraine based on the meaning of three different words in 4 languages that all basically mean the same thing.

Did Western countries promise them security? That’s the whole controversy about them joining NATO.

As you’re clearly aware America which is western pledged security, what exactly that means is debatable but the fact it happened is not.

Yes 1991(?) Ukraine agreed to give Russia the nuclear weapons in Ukraine in exchange for protection from the US, it’s very well known.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

Oh I was going the other way with it. “I’ve got my ticket officer but you’re not going to like where it’s at as much as I will.”

That. Isn’t. How. Laws. Work.

https://youtu.be/Otbml6WIQPo

Start there and work your way up I guess.

The platform isn’t creating revenue, the traffic and data collection do however create lots and lots of revenue so it really just depends on how you want to parse out their financial situation.

Because they aren’t private.

Name alone is not in itself pii but membership specifically is not private unless it’s in their privacy policy.

Because that’s not how the law works bud.

Awesome, point to one that says membership rolls are protected. You can’t find a law and you can’t be original, why am I not surprised.

It started they aren’t private.

It’s not illegal guy.

I have. You want me to have you a law that tells you what you can do, those don’t exist at all. No law says what you can do. The fact you can’t find a single law that states it is illegal is the best evidence that it is not in fact illegal. Surely if it’s so correct you are beyond reproach that we must simply take it on your word you could easily provide evidence to back your position… You haven’t because you can’t.

Grow up.

There’s not it establishes they are not protected and are in fact releasable.

Laws don’t tell you what you can do they tell you what you can’t do. Point to a law that says you cannot release membership rolls, you won’t find one and the fact you still haven’t says oh so much.

Citing a source? No, that’s one more step then you’ve done huh? Let’s see your citation perry Mason.

Unless it’s explicitly exempted in policy, companies are held to their own privacy policy federally. You should actually read what I write rom.

We know they can be released because of the unamerican acts commission specifically requesting membership rolls and the subsequent supreme court case saying they can be disclosed.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/disclosure-of-membership-lists

There are federal rules of disclosure as to 501c3 and charitable organizations but pornhub and in fact most businesses are not 501c3 nor charitable.

Is not strange at all you’re adding me to prove a negative that can’t be proven.

We just went over that again for the third time no you can’t. Your name and membership is not pii.

Awesome point to one that allow l makes it unlawful federally.

Ed: you’ll notice I didn’t say they would, nor that they could just that it isn’t federally illegal to do.

Yet you can provide it, weird huh. Rule of acquisition #237 of they can’t point to a law, there is no law. Do better rom.

You cannot publish personally-identifiable information about your customers.

We already went over this, protected information is unsurprisingly protected. Your name and membership is not pii in most cases unless protected by their privacy policy.

They absolutely can if it isn’t included in the policy, there is no federal law protecting membership rolls. None.

Laws prevent they do not allow, you’re asking for something you know doesn’t exist to avoid having to admit you can’t find a single law that says it is illegal dispite arguing at length that it is.

Yeah, he signed a 44 billion dollar deal as a joke, then he tried to get out of it when he said he didn’t mean it.

signed a 44 billion dollar deal

he tried to get out of it when he said he didn’t mean it.

signed a 44 billion dollar deal

Then he got fined another 2 million dollars for sending the judges his dick pics after the judges wouldn’t let him back out.

Sex crimes, hilarious jokes huh?! Better hope he doesn’t upgrade to pranks and start raping people.

Then after the sale went through, he did that photo op where he brought a kitchen sink and a toilet to the twitter building.

Dad jokes are relevant why?

How is stating what happened defending him?

Signing a legally binding contract is not a joke… He did something stupid and tried to save face with his fanboys and idiots that go “man make funny joke worth more than several countries. Haha funny man make me face hurt.”

Like legit how do you think you aren’t defending him.

You go girl!

Bingo. You need a contract that says your membership/username is included in the privacy policy. Barring that they’re free to release membership rolls as they please they just can’t release protected information.

It’s why multiple emails, VPN and phony personas are so prevalent these days.

Right on lady.

You funny have to rub in the fact I’m blind dude, have some decency.

Well, didn’t intended to force your into recursion but hey I’ll take it.

Point. To. A. Single. Law.

One. Uno. A singular law.

Some say he’s still slow walking into the sunset to this day.