… aber waren Sie schon mal im frankfurter Bahnhofaviertel?

This dish was brought to you by: Vladimir

1st word: “Das” 2nd word: “Rindfleischettiketierungs…gesetz”

Im not the same person but I could reply to your deleted comment (I just wouldn’t knlw what you wrote, it says “deleted”, but I can still upvote that deletee comment lol). It currently has 3 upvotes.

In dead case, I fish you the bessed.

(Their point was that Spotify’s free version is sufficient because they only want the things mentioned)

I actually know quite a bit about Argentinian football. What you’re describing was either a long time ago or not referring to the first division. The only match that would remotely come close to that would be a Boca Juniors VS River Plate match…

Bro, “Puritanism” is a religious movement of the 16-17th century. Maybe you mean purism?

(Serious) question: How do you stand not being able to select individual tracks? I honestly would rather listen to my music in any of the free frontend apps rather than being limited to that extent…

Honestly, what does this change? For paid users nothing, and the free version was always unusable with you not being able to individually select songs.

Can you name another country whose national team’s hooligans were as prominent in the media as English ones were?

I actually though of England right away, even before seeing their feddit.uk name

He could also walk away tho

Yeah but the wording is basically: “Prices are higher because they are”.

What part is wrong then? That’s pretty nuch what they say in the article.

If I understand this correctly, they are only using it to track terrorists who actively participated in a terror attack, right? What’s the big deal then…?

I’ve now informed myself on the Republicans and the Democrats views and policies and the Republucans indeed seem quite right, more so than I thought. My stance on this post is still the same but I guess this helps to put things into perspective…

Does the fact that we think even “regular” conservatives have shitty beliefs make you feel better?

I could already imagine what you think of their ideology. The problem I have is with labeling a general political orientation as illegitimate.

Do conservatives want to fund public services?

They probably don’t want to increase their funds. But yeah, public services exist for a reason. How many funds they should get it a debate to be had.

Do they want to reduce police funding?

Probably not (?), though would you mind explaining what the whole police defunding demands are about? Is it just currently viewed as a waste of money or what?

Do they want to reduce inequity and tax the rich?

They probably dont want to tax the rich more than they currently do, but yeah they would AFAIK still tax them (and tax them more than normal people). Inequality is a moral-based question again. You may find it fair if everyone has the same amount of money, someone else might find it fair that you get more money the more you earn, etc.

Thanks, this clears things up for me

“I never said it was but it totally was!” So no to that as well.

To make sure you can’t interpret this the wrong way:

• I did not claim that having the right to drop a baby was comparable to having the right to abort
• However, it is completely irrelevant how comparable they are because this nontheless clearly shows that your absolute claim of “total choice” is false.

To sum it up for you:

• The dropping example refutes your claim about total control
• You said it isn’t comparable
• I agreed and pointed out that I never claimed it to be. However, it still refutes your fucking claim. The whole point was for it to be non-controversial (I hope we agree dropping a baby is not your right) so we can both agree that you do not have total control, which you had previously implied.