Come on now, they said you can have some at home. Now go and retreat into the tiny box that you pay half your salary on and enjoy your life peasant.
Come on now, they said you can have some at home. Now go and retreat into the tiny box that you pay half your salary on and enjoy your life peasant.
Well he is pretty fancy. Born in a castle? And look at all those names!
I hate to break it to you, but sounding like “First Pucker Ice” does not sound fancy. I’m not sure it can get less fancy in fact.
What a surprise, the company that has been proven to sway the course of elections for profit might well do it again!
It gained traction by being free.
I see there are good numbers on release but I would take them with a pinch of salt. Apparently it had between 500,000 and 700,000 concurrent players on release which is already down to 300,000. Estimates of over 7mil unique players.
Now look at The Finals which has 8mil unique players. It had 250,000 concurrent players on release and is now down to around 15,000 6 months later.
Reviews wise The Finals did better on both critic and public ratings. Arguably (in my opinion) the Finals has a less interesting replayability loop but is more polished and higher quality gameplay wise.
The fact is these numbers are sadly pretty common drop offs for f2p shooters, as a lot of people want to check them out but not stick with them. Will be interesting to see how the player number fare when the next CoD comes out on Game Pass.
I think fantastic is overstating it a bit. It feels like a middle of the road CoD. Kind of a boots on the ground version of one of the hero shooter Black Ops entries with a little roughness to it.
Not bad but not great either. For the price though, it’s great value.
Those are some pixels alright
They’re pushing the limits of this simulation to see how much bullshit we can tolerate. Turns out it’s a LOT.
Give that man $31 million dollars, he’s doling out free life pro tips with his global economy crashes.