• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 18th, 2023

help-circle










  • And how much of that content was provided at a loss?

    YouTube has always had ads. But less usage meant less cost. If 40% are using ad blockers, more ads will be shown to the 60%.

    There is an unspoken agreement that if you consume you allow the ads. By using ad blockers, we’ve brought a lot of this on ourselves.

    That being said, my views are very fantastical. Profit is the ultimate driver and very few (wiki who doesn’t even use ads) are only hoping to cover costs.

    There needs to be a balance.




  • Lots of unpopular opinions in here and I’m willing to add mine to the mix.

    I’m well aware of ad blockers, and use them occasionally. I also block trackers like pendo through DNS entries on my router. I pay for YouTube.

    But I also allow ads and welcome them.

    I remember when you couldn’t get email unless you were in a school or paid for it. I remember a time when the fastest Internet loaded images line by line. I remember an Internet without videos, or even GIFs.

    Services cost money. You use the service, you are the commodity. I’ve accepted this. A few ads don’t kill me and it helps to support providers. I’m quite numb to ads.

    Yes they are tracking me and selling my data, but what does that actually mean? I get more targeted offers. More targeted ads.

    We’ve become scared of being tracked by corporations, but for what reason?

    Providing content costs money. The days of the free Internet will quickly come to an end without advertisers.


  • Don’t punish the taxpayer, punish the troll.

    Requiring a government agency to pay a penalty will only ensure the agency will work with less efficiency. In turn, ineffective agencies are further criticized and will become a target for privatization, which only ever serves special interests and those with means.

    Put an end to this one and for all. Pass a law that requires any entity which files suit on the basis of being a parent holder must show that they use the patent to earn income from sales that are proven to be independent from them and their officers. If the suit is only being filed for easy money, they should be fined heavily.