It all comes down to $/kg of payload. There’s infinite space up there.

So like I said, the only problem is payload cost……

Free unlimited power is the benefit……

So like you said, I’m correct. The only issue with thermal radiation is $/kg of payload. Again, this is an issue that they’re working to solve via methods like reusable rockets.

There have been many, many articles about how the only limiting factor left is cost. Thermal radiation is a thing.

Self landing rockets were practically impossible not that long ago. Self driving cars were practically impossible not that long ago.

There’s nothing fundamentally impossible about orbital data centres. The main factor against it is the $/kg of payload into space. That’s one of the many issues SpaceX is working to solve, and there’s nothing to suggest they won’t get there.

Cloudflare mate.

You just aren’t privy to the reason why they bought it.

You’re alleging that they’re doing this. Zero proof.

3 companies can’t have a monopoly. It’s literally in the definition of the word monopoly.

They massively overhired during Covid, Xbox is sinking, and yes, AI is increasing productivity and reducing the need for many staff.

Solar panels raise temperatures btw.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40280-9

So do giant concrete facilities with heat producing batteries on them.

The only way to carbon neutrality is nuclear. “Renewables” require a metric shit-tonne of fossil fuel burning and non-renewable materials mined from the ground to be made, all putting out and endless stream of carbon. Nuclear? Basically none.

The nuclear waste is a drop in the ocean compared to the landfill created from “renewables”. We’ll end up just blasting it off into outer space one of these days anyway.

The main polluters aren’t people, they’re manufacturing industries.

I have a theory that….

That’s not a theory that only you have lol. Concrete greatly increases the surrounding temperature. Solar panels also unfortunately greatly contribute to higher ambient and surface temperatures during the day, and make it colder at night. Big concrete cities with solar panels everywhere ironically make heatwaves worse.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40280-9

Results showed that increasing PVSPs can raise peak summer ambient temperatures by up to 1.4 °C and surface temperatures by up to 2.3°C at city-scale. …. The large-scale deployment of PVSPs at local district-scale of the Sydney during a typical hot day caused air temperature to rise by 1.5 °C during the daytime and decrease by 2.7 °C at nighttime.

💯

Australia is “reducing” their emissions by having China manufacture everything using the coal that companies dig out of our ground and sell them, then we buy it all back and ship it over here on planes and boats, while claiming we’ve reduced emissions.

It’s all a grift.

let’s make oil obsolete

Yeh good luck with that. There is literally no known replacement for oil. It is in the creation of basically everything that you interact with every single day.

I’m not exaggerating btw. There is no known oil substitute for most products that we use oil for.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/can-we-really-live-without-oil-bruce-l--g7f8f

No, the first step was all the governments literally forcing them and all the other big social media sites through legislation to add age verification. It makes it much easier to throw people in jail for online wrong-think if they have to verify who they are.

I haven’t touched reddit in years, and I have no sympathy for anyone still using that garbage site, so doesn’t bother me that they’re getting rid of the only good way to view it on a desktop. It won’t change anything, most reddit traffic is through the apps.

Is there any evidence whatsoever that they’re keeping supply low? They’re selling literally every chip they make, there is significantly more demand than supply, so if they were keeping supply low artificially they would still be making more then they are now because it would cause no drop in price and would make them even more money.

The real problem was probably that Tenor was free, and Google didn’t see a way it could make money from a GIF API.

The author can’t figure out how a company can monetise an API? Monetisation clearly isn’t the problem here. It’s possible that they’re going to launch a new product incorporating this, or more likely incorporate it into Gemini.

It’s not just America, they’re a go-to for cheap disposable cups - the type you’d buy for a party.

3 companies can’t all have a monopoly on the same thing lol