Wild how corporations have so much leeway to dictate the law.
GarbageShoot [he/him]
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
Cake day: August 18th, 2022
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
If you’d like to discuss the subject, there are many comms on a handful of instances where people would be happy to!
Comparing yourself to Yezhov is worse than anything we’ve said to you
GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.netto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What is the biggest lesson that employment has taught you?English
1·3 years agoYeah, looking busy is way more important than being productive a lot of the time. You always need to be doing something, so you just go through the motions of doing things because otherwise you’ll get shit from your employers. Waiting in good faith for more real tasks to emerge isn’t enough, so you must invent chores.
At least, that was very consistently my experience in retail.


To their credit, I think the Principles of Communism thing is partially meant as a floodgate, since the devs really do believe in their project and want to avoid over-centralization from everyone defaulting to one instance. They know many people will go “What the hell? No!” and go somewhere else and that’s exactly the point. I’d be surprised if they really thought it would get almost anyone to engage with Marxism with the prompt, especially since you can copy the first sentence of the text and not read anything else (and even just reading it is not engaging with it). I think it’s more like a little joke.
Also, copying a sentence of your choice to a pamphlet is not a pledge and I think it’s silly to view it that way. If it helps, iirc, one of the sentences that appears is “No.” and they will accept that as an answer.
But assuming this was “promoting an ideology directly,” would you find it less sketchy for an instance to promote ideology indirectly? Because if you aren’t directly doing ideology, that just means you are indirectly doing it (sometimes very deliberately). Personally, I appreciate transparency.