You dont even vote so spare me the political bait.

Why are you saying crimes of desperation when we are talking about general crime. Most of the people committing crime have food and a place to live. It’s not all homeless starving people.

I can tell you have no idea what im talking about you’re literally the person in the tweet who thinks its a simple issue that is easily solved by giving people food and housing. I dont know what planet you live on but people have food and housing and still commit crime. Giving people a good quality of life reduces crime but there are other factors at play.

Yes I agree with what you’re saying but the tweet ignores that you’re likely already doing both giving money to cops and giving money to poor people so the nuance of effectiveness of where to allocate the extra funds is not as simple as the tweet puts. I can think of a ton of times where increasing welfare does not impact crime statistics and increasing cop spending does and vice versa. I really do wish it was as simple as the tweet makes it out to be because throwing money at a problem is actually pretty easy.

If only it were that simple.

That was a solid ad

Bring it on

Yeah I know I’ve been using it for gaming for years. But when I say linux is good people might brush it off because oh you would say that as a linux user. But im highlighting that Microsoft saying this legitimizes Linux in a completely different way. It legitimizes it for all the people that see Windows as the best OS the people outside the linux bubble.

This is such a huge W for linux. It legitimizes linux as a real competitor in so many eyes.

Can you sync the music to it wirelessly?

Nice, I look forward to viewing the found footage film once the spooky events start going down.

You can keep it but you’re gonna get cursed

They’re kinda past that phase and now need to show that they have sustainable revenue and user growth. From all the numbers I’ve seen they(open ai, Gemini, anthropic) have crazy numbers. Hundreds of millions of users paying $50 a month. It’s not enough to cover training but it covers inference very nicely.

Then with agent bullshit they’ve managed to turn 1 prompt into 12 and bill the user for that extra so it’s even more profitable than the monthly subscriptions.

The economics for daily use of inference seem to make sense. The cost of inference is highly profitable. The margins on inference around 80%. The lost money from power users is made up but the average user who doesn’t user their tokens. They lose money on the free inference given away but that’s marketing and getting used to people having the product there as a crutch. It’s not the best business model but they can change it at any time and have vc cash to burn.

What doesn’t make sense is recouping the investment cost of model training and building new data centers. Because the moat on a new model doesn’t last long enough to recover its training cost.

I dont really understand the question so correct me if im misinterpreting.

Because (in most cases) kids lack wisdom even when they know a lot. The reason screen time is being limited is generally because they arent using it in healthy moderation. People arent telling kids to finish their plate when they have no issue finishing the plate.

Kids do need the rules and guidance because they do not have the life experience to make proper value judgements for things a long time into the future. Some kids do but most do not.

We need more radical freedom ballkickers in the world

Checked out Radicle, pretty cool concept. Love to see stuff using the scuttlebutt protocol.

Never used it but I bet 50% of the messages are “test”

For $17 you’d be losing money if you didn’t buy that.

Vegan gooner