I bet they would be willing to do it right while you are in the middle of something important if you paid them an extra $30 on top of that.

Windows 11 = O.S. Ima Ad-Laden. Coincidence? I think not…

As to the suspects, at this time we are keeping our opinions unbiased.

It sure doesn’t say when that was updated, but for a long period of time the use of drone when discussing unmanned aircraft was reserved for military craft that were usually armed and used to kill people. In the attempt to demonize hobby rc use, the press started calling simple quadcopters (and other propeller configurations if we are being pedantic) drones and not what they were normally called by the people using and making them in the hobby. My point still stands, the press likes to change the wording of things, and will perpetuate their narrative in order to garner views. Manufacturing fear is part of their tactic, and is why I replied what I replied to the question of why the press continues to push the false narrative of these cars being “self driving”.

so why do articles keep pushing the false narrative, even after it’s deemed illegal?

The same reason that simple quadcopters have been deemed by the press to be called “drones”. You can’t manufacture panic and outrage with a innocuous name.

If they don’t name it the Adobe they don’t have a hair on their ass.

Did some LLM put together minor and report and decide it was a minority report?

That’s brilliant.

The Box III Signature Edition.

in case it breaks something, which it most likely will.

Partially because you didn’t escape the dots.

I wish I could upvote this comment twice! I have the same feeling about how the media and others keep trying to push this “intelligence” component for their gain. I guess you can’t stir up the masses when you talk about LLMs. Just like they couldn’t keep using the term quad copters, and had to start calling them drones. Fucking media.