Impossibly difficult is an oxymoron. If something is impossible, it can’t be difficult because if it is difficult that means its very hard to achieve but still possible. If something is impossible, that means you cannot do it, full stop. It is not possible. Those are two completely different things.

🏴‍☠️

Dude, rain water is full of pollutants too. 😂

My point is if something is impossible to do, that doesn’t make it difficult. It makes it impossible. Those are two different things.

Slop ≠ sloppy, and the opposite of slop is not precise.

The fuck does that sentence even mean?

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

How is that not blatantly false? Piss off troll.

They weren’t idiots either. They weren’t stupid enough to think technology was static and would never improve, firearms technology was literally improving during their lifetime. They wrote the constitution the way they did deliberately. The constitution was meant to be a living document, true, but the only reason to change that amendment is, simply put, fascism.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

That’s blatantly false. Timothy Murphy killed a British officer during the Revolutionary War at a distance of 300-400 yards. They absolutely had the capability of precise marksmanship at the time the constitution was written. Repeating rifles were not a foreign concept either. They weren’t common yet, but there was no reason for them to believe the technology wouldn’t be improved.

No, you are. Literally read the goddamn title of the thread.

They enforce plenty of draconian shit just fine, I think they can find a way.

I’ll believe it when I see it.

That’s the entirety of this thread, that if companies are being reimbursed, then people should also be reimbursed.

And the company should be legally held responsible go reimbursing its customers.

That’s just a myth to get guys to stick stuff up their bums. I’ve spent ages trying to find this magical spot and I’m telling you, it doesn’t exist.

Everybody involved should be at 0 tarrifs. Why should Nintendo be +1 and all their customers be -1?

There’s records of customers buying products at inflated costs due to the tariffs as well. They absolutely can refund people if they get a refund.

The company paid for it initially, but the customer actually paid for it.

Lmao, what? The fucking death penalty? This shit is so backwards man.

Just because something is legal that doesn’t make it just.