So bike lanes but for cars. What could go wrong.

The future of net neutrality is already decided, has been for a while. The only question is when. Does NN end now or later. We already let the wolves in.

I think if there was something happening, people would be protesting. Probably happening all over the world if it was bad enough. I think a terrorist leader died recently so surely if they were involved, then they were the good guys.
Right?

deleted by creator

They didn’t spend a fortune on licensing for nothing.

Think of the lawsuits.
-Sony probably

How did we get here

Money!

That’s what I said. The person I replied to said that all messages are encrypted* with the asterisk being only if you specifically enable it. I clarified that it doesn’t apply to group chats though. I don’t use Telegram so the loss of functionality is actually a bigger deal to me than the argument around E2EE. Can you explain what features are lost when you enable it? It’s a messaging app so I’m curious what you sacrifice for E2EE.

Recent events have taught me that only individual chats are encrypted*. Group chats don’t have that feature.

I don’t know where everyone is staying but I normally get a choice of single serve cereal bowls, bagels with maybe 3 types of spread, some type of juice, coffee, milk, and occasionally a selection of fruit. Everything is served with cheap plastic or cardboard not silverware, glass, cloth or ceramic.

X

Are you suggesting a Bitcoin exchange also dabbles in selling Magic cards?

Piracy is a service problem.

Yes but also it is increasingly becoming a price problem

You just gotta let the sink in or something
/s

Red Sparrow is the better Black Widow movie.

And it is attached to a subscription service that rotates games on a whim.

Front + trunk

This isn’t the first EV to do this. It’s not even the first Tesla to do it.

If I remember correctly I think they gave it away for free as part of a promo for the sequel.

“… and it’ll happen to you”

Creating material that is copyright infridgement is not a desired output

Agreed.

the purpose of guns is to kill (when used).

Guns is a term with varied definitions of which not all are intended to kill. There are rubber bullets, air soft, small caliber, and even paint ball guns. These MAY be lethal but were made with other goals in mind.

Nvidia on the other hand made GPUs for applications that revolve around video, the G literally stands for graphics. Some people found out that they are also efficient at other tasks so Nvidia made a new line of products for that workload because it was more lucrative. Gamers usually only buy 1 graphics card per machine, a few years ago some would even buy up to 3. In contrast, AI researchers/architects/programmers buy as many as they can afford and constantly buy more. This has made Nvidia change their product stack to cater to the more lucrative customer.

AI manufacturers depend on copyrighted material to “train” the AI

With everything I said, these AI creators CHOOSE what to feed into these new tools. They can choose to input things in the public domain or even paid-licensed-content but instead using copyrighted and pirated content is the norm. That is because this is a new field and we are collectively learning where the boundaries are and what is considered acceptable and legal.

Reddit recently signed a deal to license it’s data (user generated content like posts and comments) for use with AI generation. Other companies are using internal data to tailor their AIs to solve field-specific problems. The problem is that AI, just like guns, is a broad term.

the method of creation makes it more likely to infridge.

Nvidia has given us the tools but until we define what is considered acceptable, these kinds of things will be inevitable. I do believe that the authors had their copyrights infringed but they are also going after the wrong people. There have been reports of AI spitting out full books on command, clearly proving that those works were used to train. The authors should be going after the creators of those specific AIs, not Nvidia.

There is a long and bumpy road ahead.

This feels like suing gun manufacturers over murder. They made the tool but they’re not the ones responsible for the crime.