• 0 Posts
  • 135 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 13th, 2024

help-circle

  • I am not knocking usb-c. It would actually be nice if the standards were move unforced so one could be gauranteed exactly which version they were getting.

    My issue is exactly what you’re saying about material science and not knowing what might come along and what it would take to overcome the EU standards. I predict they will need to revise the rules before anything would be able to meet the current standards by it’ll be 15+ years before we know it.


  • That’s what you get out of that? I have no problem with usb-c, I won’t buy anything that doesn’t use it. However, I feel that the EU has set too high of a standard and we’re going to get stuck until they revise it.

    Feel free to argue how if the EU law was applied back when USB-A was top dog, we’d still have made the switch to USB-C but I don’t see it.








  • Part of this is because the device has to connect to cellphone towers where the radio equipment is on its own lifecycle path and eventually replaced.

    Eventually the feature set of a device is too outdated for the carrier’s network to syooort it.

    Developer time is limited and so there is little to no value using that time to support very old hardware that would be WiFi only.





  • That’s my point. The term walled garden predates it being applied to Apple and now that it has, it’s become synonymous with anything Apple does is a walled garden and we ignoring other instances of walled gardens because they don’t meet all the criteria of Apple’s.

    The original term for technology walled garden was more confining than what Apple does. The term would be more useful if it remained as technology that restricts the user’s agency.