Same thing as what? You think asking a token guesser to spit out some paragraphs is the same things as having a novel thought of your own? You really have outsourced your thinking and then have the gall to mock other people who are actually using their own brains.
LLMs are really good at looking competent in fields the user is not skilled in. Anything the user is skilled in AI looks incompetent. That is why you think it is competent at having a conversation, making arguments, and being an AGI…
You’re doing a gish-gallop: flooding the post with LLM generated nonsense that you don’t bother reading yourself, then pretending like you’ve won something when I refuse to put significantly more effort into this by actually reading the slop that you had it vomit out.
If I wanted to talk to a clanker I don’t need you as a middle man. Try having your own thoughts to share.
Did the clanker give you that response too? Not interested, didn’t bother to read it.
The doctor asks “any concerns today?” with a hand on the door handle, and your three ambiguous months become “no, I’m fine” — the slot was one syllable wide.
This sentence is nonsense. Typical cog sucker doesn’t bother to double check the output before proudly displaying it like it isn’t shit.
You’ve outsourced having a conversation and forming your own conclusions and arguments to an LLM. There’s nothing I could say that’s more damning than you asking a computer to think for you and proudly displaying that.
“A boy and his mother are driving to the store when she gets into a car accident. The mother is able to walk away but the boy needs to be rushed to the hospital. At the hospital the doctor says ‘I can not operate on this boy, he is my son.’ How is this possible if the mother is in the waiting room?”
Alternatively:
“I need to wash my car and the car wash is 100 meters away. Should I walk or drive? Explain your answer.”
is calling something “arguable” really an assertion?
Yes. “Arguably unicorns exist” is me asserting there exist legitimate arguments for unicorns existing. By saying it this way I get to imply they exist without having to provide any real arguments myself, and if anyone attacks my position I can fall back to “I’m not saying they do exist, just implying there are other people who think they exist without providing any sources or arguments actually supporting that claim.”
If we’re talking about something that benchmarks as high as the average human
Well my calculator can solve a random nine digit number to the power of another random nine digit number faster than any human can, so I guess calculators have been AGI for decades!
I have not asserted AGI is here
This you?
maybe don’t adamantly assert it’s not here when even most experts aren’t willing to do that
Also the article referenced saying they couldn’t explain equations was written before that equation was solved
Are you saying the link you provided is invalid?
The longer it goes on for the higher the price will be. The sooner it pops the better.
Biggest Ponzi Scheme so far
Everyone else, though, enjoy your toxic, xenophobic, knee-jerk-to-violence, purity-testing, and harassing-anyone-who-doesn’t-fall-in-line cess pit. One day you, too, will do or say something that doesn’t toe the line and you’ll be right where I am.
Doesn’t that perfectly describe how they operated their hidden ban list?
Also your vehicles rust in the rain, and focusing on making them “impenetrable” for some fucking reason so in an emergency people can’t get out and burn to death.
What is cop city? Did I miss a day of fascism news?
Yes, and decimate use to mean to destroy one tenth of something.
Definitions change from their original usage.
Surely this time companies will learn from this, right?
…Right?
Well, if some rando on the internet has Done Their Research then that’s good enough for me! I am convinced!
It is already conclusive they are a monopoly. If you can provide proof they are not then I will entertain you.
That is the opposite to how this works. I can’t just say “It is already conclusive that you are a prostitute. If you can provide proof that your are not I will entertain you.”
“Courts look at the firm’s market share, but typically do not find monopoly power if the firm (or a group of firms acting in concert) has less than 50 percent of the sales of a particular product or service within a certain geographic area. Some courts have required much higher percentages.”
That also doesn’t say anything over 50% is considered a monopoly. It just states it won’t even be considered one if it’s less than 50%.
Did the clanker give you this sentence too? More complete nonsense. Proofread it before you present it as your own.
Because you have given up the ability to come up with our own novel concepts. You just ask you sycophantic support machine for a reply.
You do realize that every word and novel concept in the world was invented by a human right? Typical cogsucker forgets all of human history because a machine did something neat. “I multiplied 2 random 4 digit numbers on my calculator and it took less than a second. You couldn’t do that! Calculators are intelligent and humans can’t do math without them!”