How fat is she?
How fat is she?
That information is mentioned in the video
Could have said that in your first reply instead of arguing. But you know… I’m the one that needs better self-awareness.
Also, despite being ‘safe’ there are still “regulatory dosage limits” that apply (and this device seemingly does comply with).
A 6W laser could easily damage the retina.
I’m not interested in rhetorical arguments guessing ‘it should be fine’. I want a radiation output comparison between this lamp and other common avenues of UV exposure (sunlight, welding, tanning beds, etc…), or the creators/relevant 3rd party safety board flat out declare the possibility of eye damage was considered/tested and ruled out.
As it stands now, the article conspicuously avoids mentioning eyes to talk about how safe the skin is and that makes me wary.
Most of the power in welding doesn’t go into UV generation, but this lamp is all about the radiation. I’d like to see a comparison of their respective UV outputs to be sure.
wavelength is that it is long enough to deactivate viral and bacterial air contaminants, but short enough not to pass through the outer layer of dead skin or the tear-layer of humans.
What about the eyes? As a welder the first thing I think of is getting Welder’s Flash.
Here you go!
So long as we’re being blunt, this criticism can be levied at Lemmy too. There is less accountability here and your only option is to ‘find a similar federated community’ because nobody seems to want any kind of accountability or standards in the mods. Well, you have basically 2 major communities and both of them are equally stupid but in opposite directions. Viable option indeed.
Better media and infrastructure support, name recognition, corporate privacy issues instead of no privacy whatsoever, ads, pay-to-win social ‘cred’ (blue check-mark), an insane leader, and an algorithm controlling your content.
It’s not the salt that prevents the sticking. You use a larger pot with plenty of water. Still delicious though :P
;tldr Tor is fine as long as you are keeping it, and related tools up-to-date. Dude de-anonymized as using an old tool with known vulnerabilities fixed in later versions
GD it, ya got me o7
Oh I am too. I thought the ridiculousness of the whole thing made it obvious I’m joking.
You don’t understand. A simple compliment about something that obviously takes a lot of work is TRAUMATIZING! Tune in tomorrow when she tries to get her revenge via HR and they politely tell her to seek employment elsewhere because they don’t want none of her kind of crazy, and she follows up with a post about being unfairly cancelled.
This is not war this is pest control
Ah, you see it from Israel’s POV. Interesting.
At a certain point it stops being worth it. If sending a brainwashed 11 yo to blow up a checkpoint means you can no longer trust having any technology near you, your family and friends it might cause hesitation.
Your parents didn’t just stuff you in the back window?
Okay, this one made me lol 3x.
That’s 27000 streams/hour. How? Why did this take years to discover? How did this not get automatically detected within minutes?
WTF am I doing with my life if it is this easy to scam 2.4million in a year? 1 year and I could yoink it all and move to some BF island in the middle of nowhere with no extradition and live the rest of my life playing Blackjack and Hookers.
💖