I think there is a term for this. The (insert name here) effect. You won’t leave because they’re there. They won’t leave because their audience is there.
You have less incentive to stay, really. What are you afraid of missing out on?
- 0 Posts
- 11 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: August 11th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Do you think we’re debating you? We’re mocking you.
You seem pretty obviously upset.
What would make you think that a PC wouldn’t also be able to do this for longer? Lol.
13·3 months agolol ok bud
REMINDER: THIS IS WHERE WE STARTED
MY POINT = PROVEN CORRECT
PLEASE KEEP MOVING THE GOALPOST
The paper wasn’t retracted until 2010 lol. The point is that fraudulent papers can be published.
Still lmao.
This just shows the resilience of publishing, and the scientific community to fraud and [alleged] corruption
Uh… sure it does, buddy.
Tell me more about how antivax scientists didn’t successfully publish a paper with tons of biases and nonsensical findings.
No paper would be published if it was biased and as selective as you say.
That is incredibly naive of you and truly points to your lack of credibility.
I guess the difference is that those of us that would argue with you would believe that you are reasonable individuals whereas, shocker, the genociders are not reasonable.