Seems realistic. Thanks for the details.

Curious how you calculated that? What system load is it based on? Idle? Max?

Of course they would, Firefox is a huge project. But that doesn’t mean Mozilla is the only organization that can manage it.

I know, I was just being hyperbolic. Not sure why my OC is so downvoted, I’m pretty sure people don’t think Mozilla is the only org capable of leading the project.

Welll yeah, obviously. I wasn’t suggesting Firefox would somehow become sentient and develop itself.

If you disagree, why not share your opinion instead of just downvoting? Why do you think Mozilla is the only organization capable of supporting Firefox?

A project as big as Mozilla wouldn’t be abandoned. If Mozilla stopped development I guarantee more than one group would fork.

Firefox is open source, we don’t need Mozilla.

If that happens, they just fall back to the first option of waiting for their provider to set up the IPMI.

The pain doesn’t always stop when the nerves are severed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_pain

They are fundamentally different types of vehicles. But putting that aside, if you want to compare the largest payload that each vehicle can transport you wouldn’t just use the pickup truck’s GVWR, you would also include it’s towing capacity. There’s a reason 90% of the time people use a pickup to haul something, they’re towing.

This is why we can directly compare the two vehicles payload capacity.

No, comparing a zeppelin with a pickup will never be a direct comparison.

You’re comparing a pickup truck to a zeppelin, there’s no way to make that apples to apples. If someone needs to move something big with a truck they’re probably going to tow it, not try to load it into the bed.

Because of their smaller and the switch to helium Zeppelin NTs has a miniscule payload capacity at 4200 pounds. To put that into perspective that’s the same payload capacity as a Ford F250.

And that’s only the bed capacity. An F250 can tow over 20,000 lbs depending on the trailer design. Most trucks and SUVs can tow >4200lbs.

Of course, advertisers don’t need to run positive or moral ads, though.

Of course not, they’re the customers so they’re always right. And the “product” is tightly regulated.

Your entire post is calling out Samsung, but don’t smart TV manufacturers show ads?

Can you recommend a manufacturer who doesn’t display ads? It doesn’t help to single out one company if they’re all doing it.

Are you referring to this, or something else?

https://teklager.se/en/pfsense-vs-opnsense/

Several categories like incitement, false advertising and CSAM should not be acceptable “speech”.

In those examples it’s not the speech that’s illegal, there’s a real crime that the speech is part of. False advertising is a form of fraud, but if there’s no fraud involved (satire, humor, education, etc) it’s legal.

If freedom of speech only applies to “acceptable” speech, then it isn’t really freedom of speech.