ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1227
arrow-up1227imageMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 months agoIf nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 months ago3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all! /j
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoThere’s now 4 competing standards. TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoEEE Oh no that’s a Microsoft strategy
If nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all!
/j
There’s now 4 competing standards.
TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.
D+++
EEE
Oh no that’s a Microsoft strategy