Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agoWho doesn't like the running symbols in the terminal?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up17
arrow-up17imageWho doesn't like the running symbols in the terminal?lemmy.worldWaffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-squareBCsven@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoI mean yes if time is an issue, but compiled code on your own hardware is specifically tuned to your machine, some people want that tiny tweak of performance and stability.
minus-squareTrigg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoThe point being most AUR packages are compiled on each update
minus-squareBCsven@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoBut compiled on some other machine. Compiling on your own hardware optimizes it for that specific hardware and what that chip supports etc.
minus-squareexu@feditown.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 months agoNo, AUR packages are compiled on your machine.
minus-squarekautau@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoNot all of them, that’s why many packages have a [package]-bin version
I mean yes if time is an issue, but compiled code on your own hardware is specifically tuned to your machine, some people want that tiny tweak of performance and stability.
The point being most AUR packages are compiled on each update
But compiled on some other machine. Compiling on your own hardware optimizes it for that specific hardware and what that chip supports etc.
No, AUR packages are compiled on your machine.
Not all of them, that’s why many packages have a
[package]-binversion