• DSTGU@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is not a fair comparision imo. There is an assumption that salary is corellated with experience/knowledge/being useful. Fairer comparision would be judging Ferrari mechanic for not knowing how to change oil

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      I guess I’ll start screening my surgeons, attorneys, and accountants for how well they know how to use Zoom. This seems reasonable.

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I mean I agree with the general sentiment.

        However, I also understand the previous commenter’s reasoning (or not…I might be shoving words in their mouth).

        I think, especially in today’s world where basic technical competence is essentially a must, that in order to perform your job duties to a certain level of standard expected by your client or employer, you need to be able to perform basic technical problem solving. And I think this includes being able to figure out how to google “screen share, Windows”. And this includes many professions.

        Surgeon? Maybe not. I just want to have a good surgeon.

        But attorney and accountant? I would expect that if information needed to be shared with me, especially with urgency, that they would be able to confidently do so quickly, which may include setting up a quick zoom call (use Jitsi people!).

        So actually I disagree with you- I actually may screen out certain professions if they show they lack basic technical competence, like setting up a video call, or creating a spreadsheet.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        [off topic?]

        One of my favorite fictional detectives is Nero Wolfe. In one of the stories he asks his assistant if the morgue is open all night.