• glowinfly@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Maybe in the future, but for now it looks like they already amnounced their next step to how they’ll monetize their platform.

    Bluesky has revealed how it plans to start making money without necessarily having to rely on ads. The platform will remain free to use for everyone, though it’s working on a premium subscription that will provide access to profile customization tools (remember when Myspace offered that for free?) and higher quality video uploads.

    Source: https://www.engadget.com/social-media/blueskys-upcoming-premium-plan-wont-give-paid-users-special-treatment-193800247.html

    • quirzle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      remember when Myspace offered that for free?

      This seems like a strange gripe. If their business model was sustainable, more of us would be reading this on myspace right now.

      • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        May all of the for-profit websites chip and shatter.

        We don’t need them. We have never needed them.

        Let’s take the internet back to when it was a place where people ran websites for things they cared about.

        Fuck profits, fuck corporations, fuck capitalism. Solidarity across the working class.

        • quirzle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Like basically everything, there’s balance to be struck. If sites operate purely off of donations and enthusiasm, it’s easy to turn out like kbin.social instead of myspace.

          Nothing’s stopping people from running websites for things they care about right now, but you have to care an awful lot to host/support something for other people without the potential for it to at least pay for itself.

    • A subscription for a social media site. The 21th century is ridiculous. And the fact that Twitter (under Elon the scumbag Musk) introduced it first, and they’re presenting themselves as a Twitter alternative, makes it much worse. No thanks, I’m definitely staying on the fediverse.

      • Demdaru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Site selling your data? Riot!

        Site having ads? Riot!

        Site offering subscription? Riot!

        …why no site?

        • ProtonFiber@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t think its the best alternative either but definitely better than ads, why should you be mad some people can customize little things in their profile? Discord does this and you don’t see many complaining about it, they usually criticize other aspects of Discord. Also, you can’t even currently do that on Mastodon I think (correct me if I’m wrong, I could be), you could easily do that on Misskeys which most instances are japanese and the biggest instances don’t accept non-Japanese residents because of past history of people forcing english when they clearly state to be Japanese-only. Also, it’s closer to Mastodon in terms of usage and looks than Twitter, and Mastodon isn’t so similar to Twitter. Easier for this guy to criticize when not suggesting what should be done instead, people obsessively hating on BlueSky doesn’t look so upset some of them are going to Threads instead which is a lot worse for the Fediverse to reach to and from, compared to BlueSky. Maybe give ideas on how to make it easier for non-tech people to be more appealed to use something they’ve never heard of (federalization), have to choose an instance (at this point most already give up) and learn how to communicate with people from other instances. So hard to make constructive criticism, right?

      • ProtonFiber@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        This comment looks like the sort of bot comments you usually would see on Reddit, unable of constructive criticism, just plainly hate on things and don’t make your case.

        • It’s not constructive criticism, I never claimed that it was. It’s just my personal opinion. I find paying for a social media site ridiculous. Donating to a Lemmy/Mastodon/(insert any Fediverse service) instance is absolutely fine, donating to FLOSS software projects or open data projects is totally fine, but paying a monthly fee for some random feature just feels weird to me. And the fact that Elon Musk popularized it, makes it even more ridiculous for me.