• waigl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    National debt is basically where money comes from in the first place. Unless you are willing to change the most fundamental, basic nature of how modern money even works, you cannot run a (major) country without debt. It’s not even just a question of good or bad fiscal policy, it is literally mathematically impossible.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The US was on track to becoming debt free by 2030 under Clinton in 1999. Then Bush was elected and dramatically increased spending while simultaneously giving tax cuts.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/andrew-jackson-national-debt-reaches-zero-dollars

        TLDR: the last time someone that didn’t understand economics paid off the national debt, it didn’t end well.

        If there is a finite amount of money you can print before suffering the effects of inflation, deficit spending allows you to increase the amount of money in circulation without just printing more. If I owe you 100 trillion dollars, you owe Japan 100 trillion dollars, and Japan owes me 100 trillion dollars, this is good for the economy. Yes, it probably sounds like voodoo magic. No, I’m not qualified to help with that.

        Now, there is still an upper limit on how much debt is okay, generally tied to interest rates. We’re beginning to scratch that upper limit thanks to deficit spending during covid, but it’s by no means problematic and things would overall probably have been worse without the extra spending.