Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square278linkfedilinkarrow-up1983
arrow-up1983external-linkAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square278linkfedilink
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoand? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThe 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoyou’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
and? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
The 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
you’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
No worries.