psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoYet more examples of how copyright destroys culture rather than driving itwalledculture.orgexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1295
arrow-up1279external-linkYet more examples of how copyright destroys culture rather than driving itwalledculture.orgpsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·5 months agoNo, because OP clearly believes all copyright is bad while your corrected title would be at least some/most copyright has proven to be bad.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·5 months agoEh. Belief doesn’t really override logical fallacies. I know. In being pendantic, but I hate misleading headlines, especially when its a statistic. If it’s a beleif the author should state that.
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·5 months agoYou can say they’re incorrect, but you cannot correct their intentions. Only they can do that.
minus-squareconciselyverbose@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoThere is no logical fallacy. It also is not a statistic. 🤷🏼♀️
No, because OP clearly believes all copyright is bad while your corrected title would be at least some/most copyright has proven to be bad.
Eh. Belief doesn’t really override logical fallacies. I know. In being pendantic, but I hate misleading headlines, especially when its a statistic.
If it’s a beleif the author should state that.
You can say they’re incorrect, but you cannot correct their intentions. Only they can do that.
There is no logical fallacy.
It also is not a statistic. 🤷🏼♀️