Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoPeople who use distros without systemd, why do you do this?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up114
arrow-up111imagePeople who use distros without systemd, why do you do this?lemmy.worldWaffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square50linkfedilink
minus-squarepete_the_cat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoSystemd is nice, but it touches way too much IMO. Like, why does it need to touch DNS?
minus-squareAProfessional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agosystemd-resolved is an independent binary and entirely optional, just developed by the same project. That said, it’s good. Supported DoT and DNSSEC early, easy to configure. No complaints for simple usage.
minus-squareMonkderDritte@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago and entirely optional In.the sense that it is usually delivered with all the other optional modules, and for alternatives or the old default you would need a bunch of shims and wrappers.
Systemd is nice, but it touches way too much IMO. Like, why does it need to touch DNS?
systemd-resolved is an independent binary and entirely optional, just developed by the same project.
That said, it’s good. Supported DoT and DNSSEC early, easy to configure. No complaints for simple usage.
In.the sense that it is usually delivered with all the other optional modules, and for alternatives or the old default you would need a bunch of shims and wrappers.