Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agoPeople who use distros without systemd, why do you do this?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up114
arrow-up111imagePeople who use distros without systemd, why do you do this?lemmy.worldWaffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squarepete_the_cat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 months agoSystemd is nice, but it touches way too much IMO. Like, why does it need to touch DNS?
minus-squareAProfessional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agosystemd-resolved is an independent binary and entirely optional, just developed by the same project. That said, it’s good. Supported DoT and DNSSEC early, easy to configure. No complaints for simple usage.
minus-squareMonkderDritte@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months ago and entirely optional In.the sense that it is usually delivered with all the other optional modules, and for alternatives or the old default you would need a bunch of shims and wrappers.
Systemd is nice, but it touches way too much IMO. Like, why does it need to touch DNS?
systemd-resolved is an independent binary and entirely optional, just developed by the same project.
That said, it’s good. Supported DoT and DNSSEC early, easy to configure. No complaints for simple usage.
In.the sense that it is usually delivered with all the other optional modules, and for alternatives or the old default you would need a bunch of shims and wrappers.