• 0 Posts
  • 168 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 24th, 2024

help-circle
  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.ziptoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldElmo fanboys
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    You are apparently unaware of the literal tens of thousands of youtube/twitter/media people who basically did/do nothing other than promote Elon and everything he does.

    Elon Musk Can Multitask Better Than You.

    Elon’s new Hyperloop will revolutionize transit in America!

    Tesla’s stock price will be $42,690 per share in 5 years, here’s why.

    Its about a million times more obnoxious than people pointing out that Gabe actually knows what he’s talking about.

    You can go outside and strike up a conversation with any random person, and they will almost certainly know who Elon is, and most people will still think he is some kind of genius real life Tony Stark.

    You can go outside and strike up a random convo with any random person about Gabe, and chances are 98% of people will have no idea who you are talking about, unless you are at some kind of nerd/geek type outing like a video game convention, and even then, people under 20 - 25 are not likely to know who he is.

    EDIT: Yeah, I am actually fairly confident that for you to make a statement like that, you probably, unironically, need to touch grass.

    I fail to see any way you could have that opinion other than that basically all you do is argue on video game forums / discords / twitch / whatever, and that you just have almost 0 contact with real life human beings, or online spaces that do not revolve around video games.






  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.ziptoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldSad truth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I mean… basically yes?

    They could prop up AM radio talk shows.

    Thom (sp?) Hartmann and Sam Seder are … basically the only two left wing, ‘big name’ radio talk shows that still even exist post the 00’s.

    They exist almost entirely off of small individual donations…

    Do the same thing for left wing youtubers/twitch streamers.

    Almost all left wing people like that with any name recognition are doing it without any big name donors, as opposed to the Republicans who have a myriad network of wealthy donors basically bankrolling them.

    … and that would just be mirroring the Republican strategy.

    Maybe they could actually innovate too?

    But yeah, this would be like … 30 years too late.

    What did the Dems do wrong?

    Be unimaginably complacent by placing their faith in the integrity of norms and institutions that the Republicans have very obviously been trying to destroy for about 20 years.

    Its the primary problem of being a liberal.

    You just assume the rules and norms you follow apply to everyone.

    It is not part if their worldview that those rules and norms can be destroyed by cleverly manipulating them against themselves.

    What should they do now?

    Pff, I dunno, its too late, we have now arrived at fascism.

    I’ve been saying this (along with actually shift your platform to the left instead of to the right) to every mainline, Obama will save us all and everything is fixed now, standard liberal Democrat for almost 20 years.

    They have all acted like I am a hyperbolic delusional nutjob when I explain that the status quo trajectory will sooner than later lead the country further and further to the right untill we end up with corporate theocratic fascism.

    Well now we have that.

    Its… kinda like the climate, or preventative medicine and a base healthy lifestyle vs checking into the ER as an overweight smoker who broke their leg from the pain of trying to pass a kidney stone.

    Fixing the mess is orders of magnitude more costly and difficult than preventing it.


  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.ziptoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldSad truth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    15 days ago

    I am 35.

    My entire lifetime, the way Dems run presidential campaigns, the way they push the message is heavily, heavily reliant on mainstream legacy media outfits talking about and repeating their announcements and rallies.

    Meanwhile, the Republicans do the same… but they also control the vast majority of talk radio stations, and since the internet came into wide use, the number of popular internet figures with overt right wing tendencies just vastly, vaaaastly outstrips similar figures on the left, in terms of viewership and funding.

    Basically, the Dems still think that dying legacy media, with fewer and fewer readers/viewers, that increasingly has to sell out by running more bombastic, shocking news, and/or cowtowing to the whims of their corpo owners…

    … they still think that this nearly dead legacy media will give them the same treatment as in the 70s, when there were only 3 fucking TV news channels and newspapers op eds were far more influential.

    They should have learned that they needed a real way of pushing their message after 2015/16.

    Trump dominated the media without paying anything for it simply by being bombastic and saying insane shit.

    That should have set off a whole bunch of alarm bells that … Dems can’t rely on news stations giving roughly equal air time to them.

    But it did not.

    The Republicans, through their various think tanks and foundations, funded the hell out of every one willing to repeat their message on any medium for 35 years.

    Dems have never had anything like this, even though the average Republican thinks George Soros is doing something like that.

    Now, combine all of the above with another trend the Republicans have manifested into reality over 35 years:

    Public Education has been decimated. The average American now has critical reading comprehension skills roughly equivalent to a 6th or 7th grader.

    So even if huge numbers of people were still reading Op-Eds in papers… they would not understand any moderately complex discussions of policies, or history, or economics or anything anyway.

    … And this is all just a critique of how the Democrats have been at distributing their messages.

    The actual content of those messages is an entirely different failure.



  • Unless you really want to split hairs on a per article basis, in general, it is both.

    If your subject for parody is ‘news about current events’, then you can argue that anything presented in the format you would expect from a newspaper, but comically exaggerated, counts as parody.

    If a certain Onion article is fairly clearly a modification or exaggeration of a specific news event, it fulfills another common attribute of parody by having a specific thing it is parodying.

    But sure, some of their stuff falls more into satire.

    Satire more often has a more … thorough and deliberate alteration of a base material or style, with the intention of conveying a more intentional critique of or commentary on the source, a fairly obvious prescriptive moral message, by subverting it in specific ways…

    … as opposed to parody, which, by itself, doesn’t really need to have a ‘message’, it can be just a level of exaggeration that is humorous in and of itself.

    Generally, most of the Onion’s produced content is both parody and satire.


  • No.

    The Onion, and parody in general, aims at being an exaggerated caricature of the truth, something that has a kernel of plausibility in its core, but has elements or scale that is blown out to ludicrous extremes, or is framed in an unexpected way such that it inherently juxtaposes a social approach to a certain realm of topics with another realm of topics, exposing a double standard that larger society has.

    Parody is not just ‘plausible, but fictional.’

    That would … just be a hoax, mis or disinformation, or realistic fiction if not presented as news.

    … The fact that it is so difficult now to tell many parodies from a person’s or group’s actual actions or statements, or complex events… this speaks to an increasingly extreme world, it speaks to … basically the death of a general concept of ‘normal’ from which parody can grow.







  • This immediately reminded me of ‘ear candles’

    https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/ear-infection/what-is-ear-candling

    … I have been berated and belittled as a closed minded fool for pointing out to a former friend group that uh, ear candling is a scam, there’s no way it can work, the ‘experts’ doing in person ‘treatments’ are unqualified, charge an absurd amount of money, and can actually harm you.

    … This was the beginning of an insane series of dramatic bullshit whereupon I learned that this friend group consisted of a 350 pound person who demanded everyone find them attractive and healthy, and has panic attacks/seizures whenever someone doesn’t, an antivax nurse, a ‘professional’ astrologer and tarot reader, and a self described ‘leftist socialist’ pursuing an MBA.

    This group of people decided I was an asshole for not paying $300 for one of them to get their… ear… candled…